Submission
SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
All submissions will be handled electronically via the Microsoft CMT. Click for Submission at Electronic Submission System.
1. Full Length Paper (Presentation and Publication)
Prospective authors are kindly invited to submit full text papers including results, tables, figures and references. All submitted articles should report original, previously unpublished research results, experimental or theoretical. Articles submitted to the Conference should meet these criteria and must not be under consideration for publication elsewhere.
2. Abstract (Presentation Only)
Accepted abstract will be invited to give the presentation at the conference, the abstract may not be published.
Full Length papers/Abstract should follow the style of the Conference and are subject to both review and editing. Please follow the ICICSO 2023 Conference template below.
Conference Template( Note: If total number of pages are more than 6 pages, extra page fees INR 500 ( 10$ ) applicable per page )
• Formatting Instructions Full Length Paper
• Formatting Instructions Abstract
3. Attending the Conference as a Listener
The delegates interested to attend the conference as a Listener may directly make registration along with the payment of registration fees.
Review Process
All submitted manuscripts received by the conference submission management system will be checked by the Proceeding Editor .
Manuscripts that are not properly prepared will be returned to the authors for revision and re-submission.
Once a manuscript passes the initial checks including the permissible similarity index, it will be assigned to at least two independent experts for single-blind peer-review.
The Programme Chair will communicate the decision of the reviewers to the corresponding author, which will be one of the following:
- Accept/Minor Revision:
The paper has been accepted in the present form or subjected to minor revision based on the reviewer’s comments. - Major Revision:
The acceptance of the manuscript would depend on the revisions. The author needs to provide a point by point response or provide a rebuttal if some of the reviewer’s comments cannot be revised. Usually, a maximum of two rounds of major revision per manuscript is normally provided. Author will be asked to resubmit the revised paper within a suitable time frame, and the revised version will be returned to the reviewer for further comments. - Reject:
The article has serious flaws, and/or makes no original significant contribution. No offer of resubmission is provided.
All reviewer comments should be responded to in a point-by-point fashion. Where the authors disagree with a reviewer, they must provide a clear response.